Showing posts with label Apple. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Apple. Show all posts

Wednesday, 9 May 2018

Finding My Voice with a Guide for Hitch-hikers

According to one of those anecdotes that a person tells so many times that the person later forgets the actual event and only recalls himself telling the story, one night in 1971 a young man was hitch-hiking across Europe, like a number of young people did at this time, before hitch-hiking lost its "cool." On that night, this young man was drunk, lying down on a field near Innsbruck, Austria. He was looking up to the stars. Next to him was his copy of Hitch-hiker's Guide to Europe. He then had a thought - "Would it be a good idea for someone to write a hitchhiker's guide to the galaxy?"

This idea would form the basis of franchise that morphed from an idea about a comedy series where the Earth gets destroyed in the end of every episode. The result first aired on BBC Radio 4 40 years ago, leading to a series of books, a few stage shows (including one where the audience sat on a hovercraft), a TV series, a video game and a feature film, starring Martin Freeman

I bring up Douglas Adams' The Hitch-hiker's Guide to the Galaxy here because, recently, I have been getting reacquainted with it. This is because BBC radio is in the mist of transmitting the whole radio series, plus a new adaptation of the sixth book. And with this, I have re-watched the TV series and film on DVD. So, right now my mind is brimming with ideas relating to manic depressed robots, the "Shoe Event Horizon," and super fast space travel made possible by a warm cup of tea.

Also, I have been looking inward to myself and my work. Been almost 30 does make you do that. For years (maybe since I started writing fiction back in 2003) you could say I was in my "finding my voice" phase of my artistic career.  A phase pretty much every creative goes through. You start off copying other people's work, dissecting it to find out why it works, and using that knowledge to improve your own. Finding originality is overrated - mostly by lawyers who specialize in intellectual property. If you marry this with a lot of practise you (eventually) get a true creative. But a potential creative in this phase can be vulnerable, so don't insult their work so called "friends." Leave the most serious criticism to people who really know their stuff ... and Simon Cowell.

Recently I began writing a big story. It was of an idea I had for years. (I wont's say what it is let) While I was doing so I realized something - I'm becoming Douglas Adams. Of all the sources of inspiration I have ever found (and I have found a LOT of inspiration all over the place) the works of Douglas Adams can be seen as the most significant. And thinking back its no surprise.

I first read his stuff back in high school. I was looking for a book to do a report on for English class and I found in the school library The Long Dark Tea-Time of the Soul. I found it interesting. The ridiculous situations with (some) logic, how technology is used in the story and how he describes things were things that stood out to me when I first read it.

I had heard about The Hitch-hiker's Guide to the Galaxy some time earlier (in 2003 it was voted fourth most favourite novel in the UK in a televised survey). But it wasn't until the movie came out in 2005 that I finally got familiar with the story. Not long afterwards I read the books. It was by this time that the idea of the big story I just started writing was beginning to form....

I don't what to reveal what it is about right now. All I can say that its basically a fictional account of a world-changing event that happened in a cartoon I was watching back in 2005, caused by an object in a way that'll make the idea of tea been the source of creation of a new form of spacecraft propulsion look like a lead balloon.

As I began writing this story I noticed the Doug Adams hallmarks in my approach to storytelling - the ridiculous situations with (some) logic, how technology is used in the story and the long-winged way he describes things. They are there as clear as day. I can't deny it now. I'm becoming Douglas Adams.

Outside writing fiction, Douglas Adams does share some similarities to me, particularly on the subject technology. He was a avid fan of computers, especially the Macintosh. In fact, he is claimed to be the first person in Europe to own a Mac. He was an Apple fan boy long before it became cool and then annoying. 

It's a shame he died before he could see the iPhone. That device would have pan-galactic-gargle-blasted his mind.

Anyway, I must stop now. Time to grab my towel.

Monday, 20 February 2017

My New Phone

And now... another meaningless post made to give the impression that I'm still alive. Busy with other things. But don't worry, normal service will assume... eventually.

Until then let me tell you about my new phone. 2017 is turning out to be my busiest year. So much so I made a big decision ... I need to get a new mobile phone.

I can explain my decision by showing you a picture of my previous phone... a Nokia E5.

My Nokia E5
(excuse the tiger wallpaper)

Purchased from the Carphone Warehouse in December 2010 this phone has served me well. At the time I bought it touchscreen-based smartphones were still relatively new, so they were still phones physical keypads and keyboards (like Blackberrys and my old Nokia) on sale. I wanted a phone with keyboard, as I found texting with a traditional keypad annoying. It also had a 5 megapixel camera (which I have used a lot, because you only need a minimum of 4 megapixels for print quality images) and had internet connectivity through 3G. 

Some of you may be asking why didn't I upgrade earlier? I mean, I bought it in 2010. Why didn't I get a new phone until 2017? The answer is simple.... Do you know what goes into making such devices? Have you ever taken one apart and seen all that plastic and exotic metals?

from Visual Dictionary (2011)

Making a phone requires a lot of energy and a number of materials from all over the world, including lithium for its battery. They are (basically) nearly inseparable "toxic" piles of gold and silver leaf. And it doesn't help that many are made to have a lifespan of just a year or so (if you could afford to buy the latest model every year or so). 

According to this article, if I had thrown away my Nokia when most people would have done, I would have added a few extra grams to the 1.3 million tonne British share of the 48.9 million tonnes of e-waste that was generated worldwide in 2012. (And it said that this will increase by over 60 tonnes by 2017). 

I am not most people. I have kept my phone going as long as possible. Although it was dropped a couple of times in its life it still worked (even with a crack in one corner of the casing). 

However, this year proved to the point that it was time to upgrade. You see the Nokia was able to access the web wirelessly and I was able to use that function for a year or so after buying it.... until it stopped doing so and gave the excuse of "insufficient memory." I didn't know at the time that my Nokia only had 256 MB of RAM. This amount of RAM was typical for a phone at the time, but if I knew at the time, I would have been disappointed, because (at the same time) the RAM in laptops were in the Gigabytes! 256 MB was considered "a lot" in desktop computers in the year 2000. My phone had the same amount of memory as a high-spec Power Mac G4 from 2000. I know some of you will not have encountered this problem with your phones at the time, but many did. The many who quickly loaded them with apps and media. Although I didn't do this with my phone, the functions I used on it (web serving, GPS, a few word docs and the occasional YouTube clip (in the first year at least) used up a lot of meg. By 2013 I was no longer able to serve the web or use GPS on it, due to "insufficient memory." After that, the only things I was using my Nokia for were to call, text, note down what manga and movies I bought and take pictures. This was okay... until now.

As my work for NAS involves a lot of e-mailing and travelling about it was become more apparent that I needed access to e-mail on the go. And the only way I could do that was by getting a new phone. 

I was hesitant to do so to begin with, because phones with keyboards have disappeared. Almost all phones now have touchscreens. Could I get use to using a touch screen to type text? Turns out I could. After all, I have had a tablet for a while now.

So I saved up a bit of dole and (last week) looked around a Carphone Warehouse, inquired about transitioning my SIM card from a 3G to a 4G device (turns out you can without changing your pay as you go deal), and bought my self a new touchscreen smart phone - a Samsung Galaxy A5.

My tablet was a Samsung, so a friend suggested that I should get a Samsung so I could pair them up. But I know some of you are going to point out the battery problem their Galaxy Note 7 was having last year. Am I worried about it happening to my phone? No, because its an A5, not a Note 7. Also, the similar sounding S7 model cost over £500! (the A5 only cost about £350. I had the money to go that far.) 
Why I choose the A5 (apart from the price)? It's not because it has a 16 megapixels camera (front and back). Its not because of its Octa-Core 1.9 GHz processor. And its not because of its 256 GB of internal storage (which is great). What really sold it to me was this - it has 3 GB of RAM! That's more than enough for a PC to be able to edit video. As our wireless networks improve (and our web pages take up as much memory as Doom!) our phones need such RAM to cope with our web habits. And by buying the A5, I have insured myself for the next couple of years.

I was wise to wait until now to buy a touchscreen smart phone. The smart don't buy new tech when its brand new. they wait a while until the early kinks are worked out and the price drops. 

When Apple introduced the first iPhone back in 2007 it was unlike any mobile phone on the market. It set the template for future phones. But it wasn't perfect. It's processor was under-clocked to less than half a Gigahert. It only had a rare-facing 2 megapixel camera. It had only 128 MB of RAM, a 3.5-in screen with 320×480 resolution and no 3G connectivity (you were highly dependent on Wi-Fi, as 2G was never going to cut it). Plus the screen got scratched and broken easily, the battery was crap and there was no app store (until a year later). And all that originally retailed for $599 (which was later dropped to $399 angering people who bought it earlier).

Almost ten years later phones (including my Samsung) are way better now. The screen is made of tougher stuff, Batteries can last a day (if you are a light user) and when you need a charge they are now many ways to do so, even without wires. Cameras with over 10 megapixels are the norm. We can now watch movies in HD on them without the use of Wi-Fi (depending where you are). And it will continue to get better. 

But, for now, my Samsung Galaxy A5 will do me fine. For the past week I have been getting use to using it. And boy I have found it very useful indeed. Thanks to this phone I can access my e-mail and Facebook without using my laptop! But I'll still use my laptop regularly, as typing long blog posts (like this one) are a strain on the fingers if you use a small touchscreen. 

Wow! This post turned out longer than expected. And I included pictures as well. Excellent. I'm on a roll!

Sunday, 21 August 2016

My New Project - What Makes Computers Tick

During the lock-out I began work on a project I had in my mind for a few years - a book about how computers work aimed at everyone.

I started sketches for this illustrated book back in May and by now (August) I have done a lot of sketches and research in the intricate inner workings of computers. I have even designed a cover for it...

Prototype cover of What Makes Computers Tick

The idea of this cover came from a memory of seeing a book cover like this back in High School. It was an old book, I admit, but I wanted to make my book feel that it could have been made some time ago. I wanted to give it a sort of timelessness. (An near-impossible fete, considering the nature of the computer industry.) A timelessness achieved through nostalgia. 

So why am I doing this?

My answer can found in the introduction I have already written for it.

Introduction 
The Miracles and Our Alarming Ignorance About Them

At the time of this book’s publication (the first half of the 21st century) we happen to live in a world full of incredible technology. If someone from centuries ago would somehow see our time (and see all our wonderful abilities in action) that person would think we all become sorcerers. We have been able to build artificial organisms and sent them to other planets. We also made them take us across the Earth and make things for us. We have become able to capture light and sound and send it across vast distances, to allow others to experience the same things we have. We have the means to gather and bring up any piece of our vast collective knowledge wherever we are and at any time, and no matter how obscure it is, it can be found before you can say “googolplex.” And with these means we have been able to map more planets outside our solar system and other things, including our genes. Also, we have been able to make more accurate predictions with things like the weather and the state of the marketplace (with increasing success over time). And, if we find the real world boring, we can create new exciting worlds to play in … or test ideas out before implementing them for real. And thanks to such “simulations” we have been able to build things that would have been considered impossible just decades earlier.

Worded like this, it sounds like we’re living in a world full of magic. But this is our world in the 21st century. None of this is an exaggeration. Between the time of that ancestor and now we have developed a lot of new tools and technology that has made this world possible. Technology you would have trouble describing to that ancestor (If you happen to end up in the ancestor’s time with no examples to demonstrate. It could happen someday.). You could probably list ten of them right now in an instant.

Trains, cars, aeroplanes, telephones, cameras, microwaves, record players, plastic, TV, fridges, you can go on….

But, I bet when it comes to one particular one, many of you may not think of it instantly. You may have thought of it after thinking of others first. It’s not a surprise that is case, because most of the time we don’t think about them… mostly because many of them are invisible in daily life (except the very obvious ones you probably use at work or leisure). I know that some of you will have thought of this thing first, as you may be very aware of how many they are and what they do. As you are reading this many of these things are tracking stock in stores, transferring money from bank account to bank account, sending bills and statements to customers, spotting suspects in CCTV, making things to a design with very high precision, predicting the weather tomorrow, generating alternate worlds for pleasure, mapping the genes of individuals to detect “defects,” and giving life to and guiding those artificial organisms I talked about earlier (you know them better as “robots”).

It can be easily argued that of all the “miracles” we have developed since the days people were burnt to the stake as “witches,” this particular one has made the biggest impact. Without it, we will be back to life before World War II. A time when thousands of people were employed just to crunch numbers for various reasons, from managing a company’s finances to calculating the stress forces on Zeppelins.

These people were once given a name. A name that was later adopted to name the “miracles” that replaced them. A name that became so linked to these machines that soon people forgot it was once used to describe people – computers.

From large machines used in academia and data centres containing “the cloud” to devices on your desk or in your pocket (or inside you), computers are everywhere and come in many forms. They have even embedded themselves in other things, such as cars and kitchen appliances. So even if you try to go “offline” you will interact with at least one computer without knowing it.

But here’s a thought…. How many of us know how they work? I don’t mean stuff like you need to press control+alt+delete to get the menu that allows to get Task Manager or to change your password on your Windows PC. I mean their nuts and bolts. What makes them tick. I’m sure a lot of you have at least once thought about this question. With them everywhere and you using them almost every day it would be odd not to have thought of asking “how computers work?” But how many of us managed to find a satisfactory answer to that question?

This is what has been bugging me (and made me make this book) – attempts to explain how computers work to people (children and adults) with almost no scientific or technical knowledge to begin with have been …. terrible. In many attempts to explain how computers work the writers have been too simplistic or wrote too long a passage and filled it with jargon, causing confusion and alienation. A lot just point out the parts of a computer and say this does this and that does that. This is what I experienced for years. It wasn’t until I was in higher education (studying multimedia in college and computer animation in university) that I finally worked out how computers really work. Thanks to some hands-on experience making interactive media and learning how computers model virtual worlds, I gained my mental picture of how all the components of a computer interact with each other. And in doing so learned why I didn’t get “it” until then. I have been an avid reader on the subject of how things work and got high grades for physics. Surely I could have worked it out before then, but I didn’t. All the text I have read didn’t do a good job explaining it. Why?

They are two basic problems that come to finding out how computers work for yourself (and writing about it). First off, if you get hold of a computer and open it up to take a look inside you are confronted with a selection of wires, chips and circuit boards. Unlike a mechanical clock, they are no gears or wheels to see moving. No single tangible indicator to help build up a picture of how it ticks. Second of, computers are no all-in-one boxes. They are made of several component systems that work together. It’s like a car. Cars are made up of several systems that work together – transmission, brake, steering, suspension, electrics and so on. It would be ridiculous (in trying to explain how cars work) to sum them all up in a single paragraph. But many have done just that when trying to work out or explain how computers work. With no obvious moving parts (except disk drives and cooling fans – or robot limbs) and a multisystem construction, it’s no wonder many have failed the task of explaining how computers work to non-nerds. It’s no wonder (like cars) computers entered the domain of nerds.*

*I don’t see a difference between guys who talk about the differences between Fords and Chevys for hours and guys who talk about the differences between Android and Apple devices for the same amount of time. It’s the same mentality all fans have. If you love something so passionately to bother to learn everything about them (from football to that singer everyone’s talking about now) you are (technically) a nerd of that subject.

So what? Some of you ask? I don’t need to know how it works. As long as it does what I want it to do, I’m happy. Okay, continue been ignorant. But what if your computer (or any computer) does something you didn’t want it to do? What if it crashes and you loss all your data you worked hard creating? What if your processor or internet connection begins to slow down? What if someone stole your password and messed about your accounts? What if your bank sent you something not meant for you because you shared a name and date-of-birth of someone else? What if your sat-nav directs you the wrong way up a one-way street? Surely when incidents like these happen to you or in the news you want to know how such faults are possible. This is when (I think) you need to be taught how computers work. If you have this knowledge you may be able to understand how such errors happen and be able avoid such problems yourself in the future.

As more computers come into existence and more of us actively login I think there is a need for this book more than ever before. Without an accurate easy-to-understand description to work with, many people have gained a lot of wrong ideas about computers and what they are able to do. This happens to all new technology. When a new gizmo appears, the average Joe has no idea what makes it tick. And when some people get some experience with them they spread rumours and misconceptions about them due to their lack of understanding of the science behind them or false correlations between it and something unrelated (usually something medical). This is how we get ideas like, cameras taking people’s souls, people on TV been able to see you as you watch them, putting metal cutlery in a microwave will make it explode, or that high use of cellphones cause brain tumors.

Computers are no different. You may have heard (and believe) some misconceptions about them, such as the idea that they are some form of artificial brain that becoming increasingly intelligent. An increasing intelligence that might one day surpass the collective intelligence of all humans … and when that moment comes they’ll think that they don’t need us anymore and kill us off by activating the world’s nuclear missiles by playing tune down a phone line. That last bit is based on a lie a law enforcement officer may have said to convince American federal judge Marianna Pfaelzer to convict high-profile computer hacker Kevin Mitnick in 1999 …. which she believed, making her rule that after serving 46 months in jail he was banned from touching a single computer or dial-tone telephone for three years.
The fact that a judge (a presumingly highly-educated person) bought such a lie highlights how far this ignorance has become. And with computers doing a lot of things in society that is a worry. We have had false ideas that computers are “brains” and that a robot uprising is coming to cloud our judgements about everything related to computers. These are ideas that first came about when computers were new to the world and only the guys in white coats operating these early colossuses knew the truth about them – computers are stupid. They are not “brains,” they are just piles of wired up switches designed to do math very quickly. They are like trained animals following master’s commands. But that image was dull, so journalists and science-fiction writers filled our ignorance gap with metaphors and B-movie plot devices to make them sound interesting.
Although computers have changed shape and have been made of different stuff since those early “monsters,” the way they tick is exactly the same. And no matter what they do, from composing music to identifying species of moth, what they all doing is the same thing – mathematics done very quickly.

It’s no surprise if you take a look at their history and origins. When science historians write about the history of computers they also tend to link it with the history of calculators, because they have the same origins – devices designed to aid the adding up of numbers. Devices we began to need after we began to count beyond our ten fingers and toes.

To begin to understand what makes computers tick this is a good starting point – how do you make a machine add up? Curious? Want to know more? Don’t want to feel alienated by a selection of microchips in a box …. again?

Let’s us begin with their heart ….. the processor
(and find out how you make a machine add up).

[Enough Said]